Skip to main content
Home

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 940 asked in the Legislative Council on 11 October 2018 by Hon Robin Chapple

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

COCKBURN CEMENT — ODOUR NEUTRALISING TRIAL

940. Hon ROBIN CHAPPLE to the Minister for Environment:

I refer to the application to trial an odour neutralising product lodged by Cockburn Cement Ltd with the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation.

(1) Given that Cockburn Cement acknowledges in its answer to question 6.1 on the application form that the trial will permit gaseous and particulate emissions from stacks, chimneys or baghouses, stating that ''No change from existing emissions profile from either Kiln 5 or Kiln 6 is expected'', does the minister agree that emissions reduction should be the focus of any trials?

(2) Will the minister mandate that Cockburn Cement trial the use of natural gas for a period of 90 days?

(3) Given the damage caused by Cockburn Cement's emissions to residents' properties as well as negative impacts on health, will the government mandate emissions restrictions for the plant?

(4) Does the minister agree that the burning of coal on an industrial scale within the metropolitan area is incompatible with the health needs of residents?

Hon STEPHEN DAWSON replied:

I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question.

(1)–(4) Cockburn Cement Ltd has applied to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation for approval to trial the use of an odour neutralising agent in the kiln stacks with the focus on reducing odour emissions. The department has not made a decision on this application at this time.

More broadly, emissions from Cockburn Cement are regulated under the licence granted by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation. This licence was amended in December 2016. As part of the amendment, conditions of the old licence were replaced with new conditions for the control of emissions. The amended licence is currently subject to appeal, and as I am responsible for determining the appeals, it is not appropriate for me to comment further on the matter at this time.