Skip to main content
Toggle Button For website navigation bar
The Legislative Assembly meets on 08/10/2020 (01:00 PM)
Sitting Today (01:00 PM)
The Legislative Council meets on 08/10/2020 (01:15 PM)
Sitting Today (01:15 PM)
Legislation Committee meet on 30/09/2020 (10:15 AM)
Sitting Today (10:15 AM)
Search this website
Bills (proposed laws)
WA Acts and Regulations (current Laws)
Parliamentary Questions and Answers
Order of Business
Watch and listen
Scrutiny of finances
Find your MP
Members of the Legislative Council (Upper House)
President and Office Holders
Upper House Seating Plan
Members of the Legislative Assembly (Lower House)
Speaker and Office Holders
Lower House Seating Plan
What Members do
Ministers and Shadow Ministers
Find a Former MP
Legislative Council (Upper House)
Legislative Assembly (Lower House)
Find Your MP
Find out what was said in Parliament
Watch and listen
What Parliament does
Make a submission
Contact a member
Vote in an election
Parliamentary Friendship Groups
Former Members Association
Visit and Learn
Plan your visit
Educators and students
Learn how Parliament works
History, house and grounds
Events and exhibitions
Art in Parliament
asked in the
7 December 2017
Hon Diane Evers
Hon M. McGowan
STATE DEVELOPMENT — ALCOA — STATE AGREEMENTS
Hon DIANE EVERS
to the minister representing the Minister for State Development, Jobs and Trade:
I refer to question on notice 488 asked on 1 November.
(1) Noting that the additional jobs expected to be created by exports of up to 2.5 million tonnes per annum of raw bauxite over and above jobs in Alcoa's existing operations are only in construction and fabrication supply of equipment and building materials, what does the minister consider to be the main benefits to WA of the planned raw bauxite exports, in terms of regional development?
(2) In relation to (1), what does the minister consider to be the main negative consequences, if any, of the raw bauxite exports, in terms of the region?
(3) What reason did Alcoa give for requiring the use of berth 8 at Bunbury port for the shipping of the raw bauxite in addition to the use of Kwinana Bulk Terminal?
(4) Will shipping raw bauxite out of Bunbury port require rail upgrades; and, if so, will the minister please give details?
(5) In relation to (1), what is the expected construction period in years or months?
Hon ALANNAH MacTIERNAN
The following information has been provided by the Department of Jobs, Tourism, Science and Innovation.
(1) Longer term, the benefits will be the provision of additional revenue streams for both Alcoa and the state that will be beneficial for Western Australia, including additional royalty streams. Regionally, the project will provide for the maintenance of local jobs and the opportunity for local business to provide services to Alcoa, including regional transport services.
(2) The department is not aware of any.
(3) Insufficient shipping slots at the Kwinana Bulk Terminal required bauxite to be shipped through the multi-user Bunbury berth 8 facility.
(4) Yes, a rail loop and train unloader is proposed to be constructed within the Bunbury port area.
(5) It is expected to be approximately 12 to 18 months.
Using this website
Acknowledgement of Country
The Parliament of Western Australia is honoured to be situated on the ancestral lands of the Whadjuk Noongar people. The Parliament acknowledges the First Australians as the traditional owners of the lands we represent and pays respects to their Elders both past and present.