Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 1072 asked in the Legislative Council on 24 September 2019 by Hon Dr Steve Thomas

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

FORRESTFIELD–AIRPORT LINK — SOIL CONTAMINATION

1072. Hon Dr STEVE THOMAS to the minister representing the Minister for Transport:

It may surprise honourable members to learn that I refer to PFAS-contaminated soil excavated from the Forrestfield–Airport Link and to information obtained under freedom of information laws that revealed an email exchange on 3 April 2018, which were described as emails between the Department of Premier and Cabinet and the Public Transport Authority as attached.

(1) Who wrote an email on that date, apparently to someone in the PTA, stating —

The DWER review of the site-specific risk assessment presents an opportunity to advance our discussions with the Commonwealth but also a risk. The risk is that DWER technical staff may review the report to the nth degree and provide a plethora of comments which are not useful.

(2) To whom was that email sent?

(3) Noting that the same email followed with —

To mitigate this risk I suggest the following:

The name is redacted —

� has a conversation with � —

Someone redacted —

to stress the importance of DWER's review and to request a pragmatic response that is in the interest of the State. I believe that � —

Someone redacted —

should review DWER's response before it is issued.

(a) who did the author of this email suggest initiate this conversation;

(b) who did the author suggest the conversation occur with; and

(c) who did the author suggest review DWER's response before it is issued?

(4) On what other occasions has the government, the minister or the PTA attempted to influence DWER to produce a review ''that is in the interest of the state'', which I presume means in the interest of the McGowan government?

(5) What would happen to a private sector company that attempted to exert the same influence?

Hon STEPHEN DAWSON replied:

I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The following answer has been provided by the Minister for Transport.

(1)–(5) The suggestion in the email from a non-executive officer of the Public Transport Authority sent to other officers of the PTA and copied to a non-executive officer of the Department of the Premier and Cabinet was part of ongoing discussions between DPC, PTA and the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation about the site-specific risk assessments for utilisation of Forrestfield–Airport Link tunnel spoil material containing PFAS chemicals. The discussions were carried out in accordance with the ''PFAS National Environmental Management Plan'' and aimed to assist the Australian government and Perth Airport Pty Ltd in making a determination on the re-use of the spoil on Perth Airport land.