Skip to main content
Toggle Button For website navigation bar
The Legislative Assembly meets on 10/12/2019 (12:00 PM)
Sitting Today (12:00 PM)
The Legislative Council meets on 11/02/2020 (02:00 PM)
Sitting Today (02:00 PM)
Legislation Committee meet on 11/12/2019 (10:00 AM)
Sitting Today (10:00 AM)
Search this website
Bills (proposed laws)
WA Acts and Regulations (current Laws)
Parliamentary Questions and Answers
Order of Business
Watch and listen
Scrutiny of finances
Find your MP
Members of the Legislative Council (Upper House)
President and Office Holders
Upper House Seating Plan
Members of the Legislative Assembly (Lower House)
Speaker and Office Holders
Lower House Seating Plan
What Members do
Ministers and Shadow Ministers
Find a Former MP
Legislative Council (Upper House)
Legislative Assembly (Lower House)
Find Your MP
Find out what was said in Parliament
Watch and listen
What Parliament does
Make a submission
Contact a member
Vote in an election
Promote your cause
Parliamentary Friendship Groups
Former Members Association
Visit and Learn
Plan your visit
Educators and students
Learn how Parliament works
History, house and grounds
Events and exhibitions
Art in Parliament
asked in the
7 November 2017
Hon Michael Mischin
7 November 2017
NATIVE TITLE — YINDJIBARNDI CLAIM
Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN
to the minister representing the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs:
I refer to answers from the Attorney General and the minister to questions without notice asked on 1 and 2 November about the government's decision not to appeal the Yindjibarndi native title claim decision.
(1) Will the minister provide detailed chronology of his involvement in the decision-making process leading to the decision not to appeal the Yindjibarndi judgement; and, if not, why not?
(2) Precisely what public comment has the minister made about the decision following its delivery, and when did he make those comments and to whom?
(3) When precisely did the minister first receive and consider legal advice on the decision and the desirability and merits of an appeal, and from whom?
Why, if the decision not to appeal was made on or about 11 October 2017, as claimed by the Attorney General
, did the minister not record the decision until 2 November, the date of my question?
(5) With reference to the Attorney General's answer on 1 November, which other ministers were involved in the decision, what was the extent of their involvement and which argued for and which argued against an appeal?
(6) How are the minister's reasons for refusing to appeal a decision subject to legal professional privilege, rather than the legal advice he received?
: Minister for Environment, thank you. I was distracted by the very long question that has just been asked of you!
Hon STEPHEN DAWSON
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. The following information is provided on behalf of the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs.
(1) Legal advice was received on or about 29 September 2017. The decision was made on 11 October 2017 and recorded on 2 November 2017.
(2) The minister released a media statement following the decision by the Federal Court on 20 July 2017.
(3) State Solicitor's Office advice was received on or about 29 September 2017.
(4) The decision was made at a meeting on 11 October 2017, with representatives of the State Solicitor's Office and the land approvals and native title unit in the Department of the Premier and Cabinet. The paperwork was not finalised until 2 November 2017.
(5) The decision was made by the minister responsible for native title, the minister for Aboriginal Affairs.
(6) The minister's reasons would reveal matters that are the subject of legal professional privilege.
Using this website