Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 608 asked in the Legislative Council on 2 September 2021 by Hon Dr Steve Thomas

Parliament: 41 Session: 1

LIVESTOCK — EARMARKING AND BRANDING

608. Hon Dr STEVE THOMAS to the Minister for Agriculture and Food:

I refer to the McGowan government's decision to end compulsory earmarking and branding in 2022.

(1) By removing permanent identifiers and relying solely on the national livestock identification system to identify stock in Western Australia from 2022, what assurances will the minister provide to producers that NLIS plastic tags will not simply fall off, be removed or become defective?

(2) How will stock with lost tags be managed?

(3) What effect does the minister envisage the removal of permanent identifiers will have in identifying cattle and sheep theft in Western Australia?

(4) Will earmarking and branding be deemed optional or banned in Western Australia in 2022?

(5) Will the minister guarantee there will be no risk to the supply chain by deregulating the requirement for permanent identifiers?

Hon ALANNAH MacTIERNAN replied:

I thank the member for the question.

(1) Permanent identifiers are not being removed by the government; rather, regulatory amendments are being prepared to make earmarking of sheep and earmarking and/or branding of cattle optional and at the discretion of the producers.

(2) Lost or defective tags on property can be replaced by the owner of the stock. Unidentified stock that are straying or at large are subject to the regulatory provisions of local government. There are provisions in the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management (Identification and Movement of Stock and Apiaries) Regulations 2013 for unidentified stock detected at saleyards or abattoirs.

(3) In other jurisdictions that have already made earmarking and branding optional, it has had limited to no impact on theft rates. However, if maintaining multiple forms of identification is important to a livestock owner—be it to help with easy visual identification of livestock, support proof of ownership, or to discourage stock theft—they may continue to earmark sheep, and earmark or brand cattle, and the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development will continue to maintain the register.

(4) Earmarking of sheep and earmarking and/or branding of cattle will be optional from 1 January 2022.

(5) Finally—this is very important and I am sure the member would understand this—branding and earmarking do not provide supply chain assurances. There is no change to stock owners' responsibility for assurances to manage the many risks posed to their stock in the supply chain. The implementation of the national livestock identification system has greatly improved the traceability of stock, which underpins industry assurance programs such as Livestock Production Assurance, which is administered by industry through the Integrity Systems Company.