Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 438 asked in the Legislative Council on 14 May 2020 by Hon Peter Collier

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

CORONAVIRUS — LAND TAX

438. Hon PETER COLLIER to the minister representing the Minister for Finance:

I ask this question on behalf of Hon Dr Steve Thomas.

I refer to the government's COVID-19 economic response since the Treasurer's media statement of Monday, 11 May 2020, entitled ''Land tax exemption to assist home owners in full-time care''.

(1) For the financial years 2016–17, 2017–18 and 2018–19 how many Western Australian home owners were moved from their principal place of residence into full-time institutionalised care?

(2) In applying this policy for the financial years 2020–21, 2021–22 and 2022–23, what is the anticipated forgone land tax revenue expected to be for each financial year?

(3) If a person is able to return to their home after an extended period of full-time care, will they be required to pay land tax for the period of time that they were in full-time care?

(4) What modelling has Treasury undertaken on the government's land tax exemption to assist home owners in full-time care and will the minister table the relevant modelling?

(5) If no to (4), why not?

Hon STEPHEN DAWSON replied:

I thank Hon Dr Steve Thomas for some notice of the question.

(1)–(2) The Department of Finance's state revenue does not have data about how many Western Australian home owners move into full-time care each financial year. State revenue investigations identified around three cases since 2016–17 when a residential exemption was removed from a home because the owner had moved into care. In each case land tax of less than $2 000 applied after the exemption was removed. Despite the low number of identified cases, the government considered it was unfair for people to pay land tax when they could no longer live in their homes because they had moved into full-time care and the home is not rented out.

(3) Land tax is not required to be repaid if a person is able to move back home after being in care.

(4)–(5) Given the low number of cases, modelling was not undertaken to estimate the annual revenue forgone as a result of introducing this exemption.