Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 398 asked in the Legislative Council on 12 May 2020 by Hon Donna Faragher

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

CORONAVIRUS — SCHOOLS — BOARDING SCHOOLS

398. Hon DONNA FARAGHER to the Minister for Education and Training:

My question is somewhat similar to that of Hon Alison Xamon. I refer to the reopening of WA public school residential boarding facilities and the inconsistency in approach being taken to visiting arrangements by some colleges.

(1) Can the minister reconfirm that college managers and agricultural college principals are to manage requests using their discretion but should accommodate requests for short-term contact visits such as an appointment or a short visit with a parent outside a facility?

(2) Can the minister advise why students who return to boarding are not permitted to leave the college during term when the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee guidelines on risk management for reopening boarding schools and school-based residential colleges state that out-of-facility visits, including home visits, should be reduced rather than banned?

(3) Can the minister confirm that visiting arrangements, both short-term contact visits and home visits, are subject to the week 3 review currently being undertaken?

Hon SUE ELLERY replied:

I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. I will make some general remarks because I know that she has been contacted by a number of parents about this issue, and I suspect others in the house have as well. The first thing to note is that the advice all along from the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee has been different about residential facilities and schools. From the beginning, the AHPPC has provided advice that residential facilities present a higher risk than schools, so the provisions and measures put in place to address residential colleges were always going to be different from those for schools.

Secondly, the approach that we have taken about how we deal with public health changes that we introduce in Western Australia is to do it in a staged way. The theory behind that is if we do too many changes at once and there is an outbreak, it is hard to do two things. It is hard to identify the source of the outbreak and it is also hard to wind back the relevant measures because we do not know exactly what has happened. We took the AHPPC advice, as always, as the framework, and adopted a set of measures specific to Western Australia. I think it is worth noting that I have checked closely with my colleague, the Liberal Minister for Education in South Australia—we may or may not be in a nightly competition about how many students each of our jurisdictions has back at school, and he may or may not be winning—and its system of having students going back to school is similar to ours. It has not opened its residential facilities yet, and neither has Queensland, although it has plans to. New South Wales has not opened its residential facilities, although it plans to. In Victoria, no schools are open yet, although it plans to. In Tasmania, nothing is open yet, although it plans to. Therefore, Western Australia and New South Wales have led the way in having residential facilities open at all.

The health advice is that we need to put in place different measures to address different issues. I will also make this point before I provide the specific answers to the member's question. I saw research today that shows that 80 per cent of the world's children have had their education seriously disrupted by COVID-19. From this government's point of view, we want children back learning where they learn best, which is in the classroom, as soon as possible and as safely as possible. I know that the measures put in place around residential boarding facilities in particular have caused some angst for parents. I understand that; I really do. But this is about getting the settings right and doing it in a cautious, measured and staged way. We have said all along that we will review these provisions, as with all of the school provisions we put in place this week, and we are doing so, and we consulted broadly with a range of groups yesterday.

I will deal with the specifics of the honourable member's question.

(1) Yes.

(2) States adopted their own measures within the framework of the AHPPC guidelines to meet each state's context. The Department of Education took a cautious and measured approach to the reopening of residential facilities, including the management of out-of-facility visits.

(3) All school arrangements, including those for residential colleges, will be reviewed this week.