Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 356 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 14 June 2022 by Mr P.J. Rundle

Parliament: 41 Session: 1

FIREARMS OWNERSHIP — ASSAULT

356. Mr P.J. RUNDLE to the Minister for Police:

I have a supplementary question. The incident happened in High Wycombe, which was within the map. The minister has not answered whether he has had contact with the victim. Can the minister update us on the victim's condition, and will the minister apologise to both him and any future victims?

Mr P. PAPALIA replied:

I do not know whether my office has received contact from the victim—one of many—of gun theft that the member is referring to. I can again address the stupid claim that the member just repeated: there was no map and no possibility at all of that individual's address being revealed by the maps that were published in The West Australian that were provided by the Western Australia Police Force. It is disgraceful, it is shameful and it is embarrassing that he should continue to repeat that stupid suggestion. Do not do it again, member. As a bit of advice, the member is directly attacking the Western Australia Police Force and the member is suggesting that they have provided the address of this individual. If that person was subject to the theft of a firearm, it is because there are many firearms across the state. They are in many different locations and they are very attractive to criminals. They are regularly stolen. That is why we most recently amended the act to increase penalties for that very crime, and we are intending to rewrite the entire Firearms Act. Right now we are in the process of rewriting the entire act to make it far more challenging for criminals to get their hands on firearms.

I just cannot understand why the member sees any political gain or profit out of pursuing this stupid line of questioning and encouraging ridiculous claims that suggest somehow a dot about the size of three suburbs near High Wycombe somehow led to an individual stealing these particular firearms. Understand this: if a criminal went to any street in the metropolitan area, odds on they will get at least one firearms owner, possibly as many as three, in that street. That is a fact. Virtually every single street in the metropolitan area has a licensed firearms owner resident within the street. People do not have to search very hard to find firearms owners.