Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 609 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 8 September 2020 by Mr M. Hughes

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

CORONAVIRUS — HEALTH ADVICE

609. Mr M. HUGHES to the Premier:

I refer to Western Australia's success in stopping the spread of COVID-19, which has meant the state has now gone 150 days without a case of community transmission.

(1) Can the Premier outline to the house what role health advice has played in this government's response to COVID-19, including its decision to implement a hard border?

(2) Can the Premier advise the house whether this advice has been made public?

Mr M. McGOWAN replied:

(1)–(2) I thank the member for Kalamunda for the question. It is true that we are now at 150 days in Western Australia without a case of community transmission across our state, which is a good position to be in and something that we are obviously very keen to see continue. It is a credit to every Western Australian, especially all those Western Australians who have accepted the rules and sacrifices and pulled together during this very difficult time. We know that it has been difficult for many people, particularly those who wanted to travel to the eastern states, who have family, friends and loved ones there, or those who wanted to come back and for whom there have been some impediments in relation to that. We are doing the right thing by Western Australians when it comes to our border arrangements, in particular the hard border. It has been based on the best of health advice.

I am aware that there have been claims by the Liberal Party that we have not shared the health advice. I saw that on the television on Friday. I want to explain why those claims are false. I will make a few points. Firstly, health briefings have been regularly offered to the opposition. The last health briefing was yesterday. Secondly, on 16 June, the government tabled 149 documents in this house that set out all the health advice and all the information upon which the government has relied in putting in place the hard border. It was 149 pages of information. It appears that members of the Liberal Party have not noticed that, so I will now give it to them again. I seek to table that information.

[See paper 3610.]

Mr M. McGOWAN: These documents include specific advice on the closing the border directions to the Commissioner of Police. I will quote one of the many lines of from the Chief Health Officer. He states —

If the Closing the Border Directions were revoked, this would result in an increase in the risk of a re-introduction of the disease and subsequent community transmission.

That was tabled in this Parliament on 16 June.

Thirdly, in the Legislative Council on 18 August, the government tabled the Chief Health Officer's advice on phase 4 restrictions and the cancellation of the Perth Royal Show. In recommending a delay to phase 5, the Chief Health Officer stated, and I quote again —

The implementation of border controls and public health, mass gathering, and physical distancing measures continues to be highly effective in controlling the COVID-19 outbreak in Western Australia �

I seek to table that again so that the Liberal Party understands the evidence upon which the government relies.

[See paper 3611.]

Mr M. McGOWAN: Finally, I will table, for the information of the Liberal Party, the judgement of Justice Rangiah in the Federal Court on 25 August. Justice Rangiah of the Federal Court heard the evidence of Clive Palmer's witnesses, the federal Liberal Party's witnesses, and the state government's witnesses. Mr Justice Rangiah concluded, and I quote again —

          The border restrictions have been effective to a very substantial extent to reduce the probability of COVID-19 being imported into Western Australia from interstate.

          If the border restrictions were replaced by that suite of measures plus a ''hotspot'' regime, involving either quarantining or banning persons entering from designated hotspots, they would be less effective than the border measures in preventing the importation of COVID-19.

For the benefit of the opposition, I table the document.

[See paper 3612.]

Mr M. McGOWAN: It is 91 pages of evidence that backs the state government's position on the border. In total, we have now tabled 242 pages of information so that the state Liberal Party can understand the evidence upon which we have relied in relation to the decisions that we have made. This is the second time that I have done it. Any claims made by the Liberal Party that we have not shared the health advice, as I heard last week, are false. We have tabled the information again in case its members did not know that the information had been tabled or in case they deliberately ignored the fact that we had tabled the information.