Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 798 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 14 October 2020 by Mr I.C. Blayney

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

HOUSING — BUILDING BONUS SCHEME

798. Mr I.C. BLAYNEY to the Treasurer:

I have a supplementary question. When could we expect the Treasurer to tweak the building bonus so that the pipeline of work created can continue, rather than falling off a cliff in 2021, as predicted by the industry?

Mr B.S. WYATT replied:

I will make the point that the industry is good at predicting dire crises, member for Geraldton. The point of the stimulus was that—a stimulus. It has been successful. There are some in the property sector who like to demand a stimulus, complain about the stimulus, and then want the stimulus changed. Nonetheless, the government has proven itself over the last three years to be receptive to the requests, demands and complaints of the property sector. I think some $1.6 billion in extra spend from the consolidated account has flowed through under this government in support to the property sector. That is generous support by the Western Australian taxpayer. The member made a correct point that, at some point, unless we can get back to a more normalised population growth—the member for Riverton is not here but he made the point last night and he was correct—we will bring forward a lot of demand, and that has been successful, but the property sector also needs to understand it needs to bring forward activity. In answer to the member's question, yes, of course we are proving ourselves always to be receptive to the ongoing expectations, demands and complaints of the property sector.