Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 842 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 24 November 2021 by Ms L. Mettam

Parliament: 41 Session: 1

FAMILY AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — DVASSIST

842. Ms L. METTAM to the Minister for Prevention of Family and Domestic Violence:

I refer to the role that the statewide regional domestic violence helpline DVassist has provided in supporting 33 local government communities across regional WA and the fact that people in regional WA are three times more likely to be exposed to family and domestic violence. Will the minister commit to working with the organisation ahead of the next state budget to ensure that it can continue its critical work across the state, particularly in the regions?

Ms S.F. McGURK replied:

I am pleased that the member has asked me a question about domestic violence, because it was pointed out to me just recently that of the 50 media statements that the member for Vasse has put out through the Leader of the Opposition's office since the election, not a single one to date has been about family and domestic violence.

Several members interjected.

The SPEAKER: Order, please.

Several members interjected.

The SPEAKER: Order, please. That is not an invitation for others to comment.

Ms S.F. McGURK: On the eve of our 16 Days in WA campaign, I thank members who have donned their badges early for the campaign that commences tomorrow. This is a community-led campaign that says that everyone has a role to play in understanding the extent of violence against women and calling it out, so I thank members in advance for their support of that campaign.

With regard to the McGowan government's focus on and record investment in addressing domestic violence, I stand very, very proud of the work that we have done—the focus, determination and cooperation across portfolios. There has been significant and nation-leading law reform in concert with the Attorney General and there is the perinatal screening that is occurring in health. I was at the North Metropolitan Health Service just a few weeks ago to announce its protocols in screening not only staff, but also patients, for domestic violence. In education, we have the Respectful Relationships program through schools. With Housing, we are prioritising and making sure that women experiencing domestic violence are able to get into housing. Also, of course, there will be amendments to the Residential Tenancies Act. When I look across the portfolios of government, every other minister and every other government department has worked in cooperation to make sure that this is a whole-of-government effort. The Minister for Police just pointed out how the firearm prohibition amendments before the house now will benefit and make sure that anyone who is identified as a perpetrator of domestic violence or a risk will no longer be able to hold a firearm licence. The dollars, also, have been significant in regard to the effort by this government. I can talk across any range of initiatives that we have put in place.

The program the member asked about is called DVassist and was funded by the federal government. I think it was coordinated by the federal member of Parliament Nola Marino, who organised some federal funding for that program, which was initially led by an Esperance woman with lived experience. I made it very clear to the woman who initiated that program, and to the organisers since, that this program is not in our budget agenda. We committed, in the last election, to fund two new women's refuges and since building those refuges we have committed to double their capacity under the COVID recovery money. We have funded two new hubs. I have outlined all the other initiatives that we have put in place, so I have made it very clear to DVassist that it is not something that we are able to fund—we are able to step up when the federal government puts money into an initiative and steps away and expects that the state government can pick up the tab. We cannot do that. We cannot keep stepping up when the federal government makes initial funding and then steps away. It did it with Safe at Home.

Several members interjected.

The SPEAKER: Order, please!

Ms S.F. McGURK: It did it with Keeping Women Safe in Their Homes a couple of years ago, which is an important program in which women and children are prioritised to stay in their homes. The federal government pulled funding out of that and we had to step up and plug the gaps.

I have met with DVassist a number of times and I have made no criticism of the work that it is doing, but we cannot continue to step up when the federal government pulls out of its funding commitments in this state.

Several members interjected.

The SPEAKER: Order, please!