Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 561 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 12 October 2021 by Mr P.J. Rundle

Parliament: 41 Session: 1

ATTORNEY GENERAL — GIFTS AND TRAVEL

561. Mr P.J. RUNDLE to the Premier:

I have a supplementary question. If the minister is not a minister when they leave this place, how does the Premier expect to avoid any perceived or real conflicts from members of his cabinet given the loophole this so clearly creates?

Mr M. McGOWAN replied:

I do not understand the point the member is trying to make and I suspect the member does not either! As I said, and I think I said it during one of the press conferences I went to, a minister is required to adhere to the Ministerial Code of Conduct. If the member is referring to the Attorney General, he has adhered to the code of conduct. The code of conduct is the same as it was when you were in government. It has not changed. If someone wants to go to a birthday party with someone else and they get a lift there, is that the issue the member is saying—that someone goes to a birthday party? If the point is that someone went to a birthday party, is it not a bigger deal that when in office, the then Leader of the National Party, Brendon Grylls, flew around in a helicopter with Clive Palmer, received a $260 000 donation and tried to support and assist Clive Palmer in some of his dealings? Is that not a bigger deal than someone going to a birthday party?

If the member for Roe's point is that Crown has made political donations—I think it is, even though he probably does not understand it—since the establishment of the Bergin inquiry in New South Wales on 14 August 2019, Crown has made more than $50 000 in donations to the Liberal and National Parties in Western Australia. Is that the member for Roe's point, because that occurred? If the member is so concerned about that, why does he not pay Crown back? I invite a further question to understand this. If that is the member's concern, he can answer that question. Otherwise, all he is doing is muckraking. Member for Roe, I saw you—I do not blame you for going—at a whole range of AFL grand final events. As we saw, the tickets had some cost to them. I went as well. The grand final has been held in Victoria for the last 140 years, and I suspect that every year the Victorian Premier goes. As Gill McLachlan told me, the Prime Minister always goes. It is expected that you go to these events. As the Minister for Sport and Recreation said, the grand final here in Perth the other weekend was a wonderful event. Do you know who else I saw there? I saw the federal Minister for Sport, Richard Colbeck; the Tasmanian Minister for Sport and Recreation; Ken Wyatt; Michaelia Cash; Ben Morton; and the Leader of the Opposition. I saw Colin Barnett, and I had a good chat with him. I did not see Julie Bishop there, but I would not be surprised if she was. I understand that former Liberal Premiers were there as well. I saw all these people there. Is the member for Roe's point that that was wrong?

Ms A. Sanderson: He doesn't know.

Mr M. McGOWAN: No, because he does not know what point he is trying to make. Someone writes these questions for the member for Roe; he stands to read them, but he does not know what he is reading. He is a political version of Brick Tamland.