Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 466 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 7 September 2021 by Ms M.J. Davies

Parliament: 41 Session: 1

CORONAVIRUS — POLICE — G2G PASS

466. Ms M.J. DAVIES to the Minister for Police:

Before I ask my question, on behalf of the Leader of the Liberal Party, the member for Cottesloe, I welcome year 11 John XXIII College students who are here in the gallery today.

I refer to the G2G PASS application process for entry into Western Australia and the number of people being rejected multiple times when applying for compassionate reasons, like Emma Potter, who wants to visit her dying mother.

(1) Does the minister think it is acceptable that cases like Emma's get dealt with only after the media exposes the failure of the system?

(2) Will the minister publish the conditions people are required to meet to qualify for entry under the category of ''extraordinary circumstances''?

Mr P. PAPALIA replied:

(1)–(2) I thank the member for her question. As the member knows, responsibility for the supervision of G2G passes lies with the State Emergency Coordinator. He uses the police as his assets when responding to requests for G2G passes. I have no idea about individual applications. I have taken the time to seek advice from the Commissioner of Police, the acting Commissioner of Police, and also the Operation Tide commander, Deputy Commissioner Gary Dreibergs, on this matter. They have been absolutely clear in their response. It is a matter of fact that when someone's initial application is rejected, that is due to a lack of provision of evidence to support their application for exemption under compassionate or any other grounds. In the event that their application is rejected, they receive notification—via email generally—which states that they have to provide further evidence. I do not know about this particular case as I am not familiar with it, and nor should I be. On a day-to-day basis, I am not aware of individual cases. Invariably, people reapply without adjusting their application, and they reapply again. They reapply multiple times without changing their application and without referring to the advice that they have been provided by the police in response to their initial applications. Consequently, their application gets rejected. No matter how many times someone reapplies in the same fashion—that is, by failing to supply additional information—it will be rejected. I absolutely support the police doing that. They are defending the state against COVID. They are keeping us all safe. The measures that are applied by the police and other authorities at the borders and elsewhere around the state ensure that we are able to benefit from the economic benefits that the Premier referred to and the lifestyle benefits we enjoy. We are able to meet here without a mask and without social distancing. All of those facts confirm that we benefit from the measures that are taken. I do not resile in any way from supporting the police in the performance of their duties.

With respect to the specific matter, I confirm that there is no way that any appearance in the media or any appearance on a talkback show has any impact at all on the police conducting their G2G —

Several members interjected.

Mr P. PAPALIA: I know that most of the time, the police do not even know when these claims are made. I know that what remains of the Liberal Party in Western Australia listens assiduously to Liam Bartlett's show on 6PR, but I can guarantee them that not many other people do. I tell you this: the police governing G2G do not.