Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Council meets today (10:00 AM)Watch live
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 776 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 17 November 2021 by Mr D.R. Michael

Parliament: 41 Session: 1

ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE BILL 2021

776. Mr D.R. MICHAEL to the Premier:

I refer to the McGowan Labor government's commitment to empowering Aboriginal voices and protecting and respecting Aboriginal heritage.

(1) Can the Premier outline to the house what the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Bill will mean for Aboriginal people and traditional owners when it comes to decisions about what happens on their land?

(2) Can the Premier outline to the house what consultation has been undertaken in delivering this bill?

Mr M. McGOWAN replied:

(1)–(2) I thank the member for the question.

Several members interjected.

The SPEAKER: Just to be clear, members of the opposition, the Premier has barely started his answer and you are already interjecting. Can we just hear the Premier's answer, thank you.

Mr M. McGOWAN: The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Bill will deliver the most progressive cultural heritage legislation in Australia. It is clear that the 50-year-old act as it currently stands is out of date, and that is widely recognised across the community. The first attempt at reform was undertaken in 1991–92 by the then Lawrence government in Western Australia. It failed to pass. As a result of that failure, there has been 30 years of inertia, and it is the Aboriginal community of Western Australia that has suffered.

The bill we have introduced will put Aboriginal people at the heart of decision-making about the management and protection of cultural heritage sites. It is far superior to the 2014 legislation introduced by the last Liberal–National government, which did not give Aboriginal people anywhere near the decision-making power that is embedded in this legislation. It is the single biggest piece of reform to Aboriginal affairs to happen in WA this century. It focuses on agreement between land users and traditional owners to ensure that Aboriginal people can negotiate outcomes for projects and opportunities on the land. It will abolish the section 18 approval process. It will also embed the principles of free, prior and informed consent in its agreement-making processes. It will do this by mandating that agreed Aboriginal cultural heritage management plans demonstrate informed consent from Aboriginal parties. Traditional owners will be able to apply to have very important areas made a protected area in which no-one can apply to damage Aboriginal cultural heritage.

The bill is the culmination of almost five years of development, three years–plus of consultation, 175 workshops involving more than 1 500 people, and 380 submissions. I would like to thank all groups, especially the Aboriginal groups and people who have been involved in the consultation, represented through native title bodies, claimant groups, the Aboriginal Advisory Council and individual Aboriginal people. This has been one of the largest consultative processes I have seen in 25 years. The state government will continue to work with Aboriginal people on the regulations and co-design process and key documentation around this legislation if and when it passes the Parliament.

This represents the most progressive Aboriginal heritage regime Australia has ever seen. It is arguably as good as anything anywhere in the world. The fact of the matter is we will never reach consensus on each and every clause. That is not possible and not realistic. The perfect is the enemy of the good. What this bill will do, however, is finally embed by law Aboriginal people and traditional owners in the land management regime of this state. It will also mandate agreement-making with traditional owners in line with native title laws.

I would like to thank in particular, as I said earlier, the former Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Minister Wyatt; the current minister, Hon Stephen Dawson; and the constructive engagement of Terry Redman. I would also like to thank the former member for Dawesville and Leader of the Liberal Party, Zak Kirkup, who actually offered to jointly sponsor the former bill. It would be great if we had that form of bipartisanship now.

Visitors — Success Hill Action Group

The SPEAKER: Just before I give the member for Roe the call, I would like to acknowledge the members of the Success Hill Action Group, locally known as SHAG, on behalf of the member for Bassendean.