Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 857 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 5 November 2020 by Mr I.C. Blayney

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

DONGARA–GERALDTON BYPASS ROUTE ALIGNMENT SELECTION STUDY

857. Mr I.C. BLAYNEY to the Minister for Transport:

I refer to the Dongara–Geraldton bypass route alignment selection study.

(1) Is the minister aware of a large amount of community concern in the Allanooka and Walkaway areas about the proposed route due to its impact on the community, the environment at the Allanooka reserve and valuable farmland?

(2) Why was upgrading the existing Brand Highway as far as Rudds Gully not considered as an option?

Ms R. SAFFIOTI replied:

(1)–(2) I thank the member for Geraldton for that question. A number of options were considered as part of the process of determining the preferred corridor. The preferred corridor was announced about three weeks ago. Last week, I visited Geraldton to meet with the Shires of Irwin and Chapman Valley and the City of Greater Geraldton. We discussed the fact that we have the preferred route and now we are consulting with individual landowners and groups. In respect of the member's comments about the Brand Highway, there are a number of difficulties with expanding the Brand Highway through that area; for example, it would pretty much cut off access to many landowners. Secondary access points would have to be built and there would be an enormous disruption to landowners along that way as well. A number of options were considered, but this is the preferred option. At the moment, consultation is happening on the details of the route. As I said in that meeting, where we can avoid private landownership and structures we will do that. We are working now through the fine detail to create a detailed route. We continue to consult with all the landowners in that area; that consultation is happening right now.

I went to Geraldton to meet with the relevant shires. The Shire of Northampton was not there, but the Shire of Irwin spoke on its behalf. We sat and talked through all their issues. I am not sure where the City of Geraldton is at with the project; sometimes it supports the project and sometimes it does not. But I know that many of the residents want this project to go ahead because they want Geraldton to grow. They want to see increased tourism possibilities and they want to separate, where possible, heavy traffic from tourist traffic in particular. That is what we are working on. As I said, we are working with individual landowners to ensure that the final route minimises disruption and impact. As always, a lot of work has to happen around local access and making sure in particular that businesses can continue to operate.

The key thing that I have heard, in particular from those shires and the landowners north of Geraldton, is that they want certainty. This route has been discussed and on the table for about 15 to 20 years. As I said, the easy option was to do nothing, particularly north of Geraldton, and to leave the lines on the map. But I am committed to giving landowners certainty. It is tough and challenging, but that is why we are working with individual landowners and groups and we have dedicated Main Roads Western Australia consultation happening to provide people with certainty as soon as possible.