Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 779 asked in the Legislative Assembly on 24 November 2022 by Ms J.J. Shaw

Parliament: 41 Session: 1

JUDICIAL OFFICERS — GENDER EQUALITY

779. Ms J.J. SHAW to the Attorney General:

I refer to the McGowan Labor government's commitment to gender equality and its ongoing efforts to boost the participation of women in all facets of public life. Can the Attorney General update the house on this government's efforts to increase the representation of women among the judiciary?

Mr J.R. QUIGLEY replied:

I thank the member for Swan Hills for the question. When this government came to office in March 2017, the representation of women as presiding and judicial officers in the various Western Australian jurisdictions was not high. Of the six jurisdictions—the Supreme Court, Family Court of Western Australia, State Administrative Tribunal, District Court, Magistrates and Children's Court, and Coroner's Court—women made up 38 per cent of those roles compared with 62 per cent for men. This was despite there being more women in the legal profession than men in every state and territory of Australia. Nationally, 53 per cent of solicitors are women. The rate of growth of solicitors joining the profession in the decade to 2020 was 67 per cent for women, compared with 26 per cent for men.

This government introduced the justice pipeline model to facilitate planning for how to increase the number of judicial officers on a supply–demand model. As a result, under this government, the number of judicial officers has risen from 135 to 167. In filling these new judicial positions and replacing retiring judicial officers, I have tried to correct the gender imbalance that I inherited. Of the 90 judicial appointments I have made as Attorney General, 57 have been women—so almost two-thirds. These efforts have had a historic effect. I am pleased to announce that after recent appointments, the proportion of women in judicial roles in Western Australia is now slightly higher than men—51.5 per cent, against 48.5 per cent for men. This equates to 86 women and 81 men amongst the 167 jurists. This is the first time in Western Australia's history that women have outnumbered men on the bench. This has been driven by an increased number of women on the Magistrates and Children's Court, up from 19 to 33; the District Court, up from seven to 17; the State Administrative Tribunal, up from 11 women to 19; and the Supreme Court, which has doubled from three to six women. I further note that of the six jurisdictions, four—the Family Court, Coroner's Court, District Court and SAT—have women as head of jurisdiction. The Magistrates Court and Supreme Court have men as head of jurisdiction.

Additionally, in recognition of the role of women as primary family carers, this government, for the first time, recently appointed two female magistrates part time—one is on two days a week and one is on three days a week. I am not aware of any other jurisdiction in Australia in which gender equality has been achieved on the judicial benches. I wish to thank the Premier and cabinet for the solidarity they have shown in achieving this historic milestone in Western Australia.